Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:14:12 GMT -4
It was accepted that the plaintiff-defendant was more seriously at fault than the man, and both divorce cases were accepted, the parties were divorced, the woman's claims for alimony and compensation were rejected, and 10,000.00 TL non-pecuniary damages were awarded for the man... As explained in paragraph (1) above, the defendant-plaintiff woman is seriously at fault in the events that led to the divorce. The woman's faulty behavior also constitutes an attack on the man's personal rights.
In the concrete case, the conditions France Telegram Number Data of Article 174/2 of the TMK were met for the benefit of the plaintiff-defendant man. In that case, while an appropriate amount of non-pecuniary compensation should be assessed in favor of the plaintiff-defendant man, taking into account the social and economic situations of the parties, the severity of the fault and the principle of fairness (TMK Art.It was accepted that the plaintiff-defendant was more seriously at fault than the man, and both divorce cases were accepted, the parties were divorced, the woman's claims for alimony and compensation were rejected, and 10,000.
00 TL non-pecuniary damages were awarded for the man... As explained in paragraph (1) above, the defendant-plaintiff woman is seriously at fault in the events that led to the divorce. The woman's faulty behavior also constitutes an attack on the man's personal rights. In the concrete case, the conditions of Article 174/2 of the TMK were met for the benefit of the plaintiff-defendant man. In that case, while an appropriate amount of non-pecuniary compensation should be assessed in favor of the plaintiff-defendant man, taking into account the social and economic situations of the parties, the severity of the fault and the principle of fairness (TMK Art.
In the concrete case, the conditions France Telegram Number Data of Article 174/2 of the TMK were met for the benefit of the plaintiff-defendant man. In that case, while an appropriate amount of non-pecuniary compensation should be assessed in favor of the plaintiff-defendant man, taking into account the social and economic situations of the parties, the severity of the fault and the principle of fairness (TMK Art.It was accepted that the plaintiff-defendant was more seriously at fault than the man, and both divorce cases were accepted, the parties were divorced, the woman's claims for alimony and compensation were rejected, and 10,000.
00 TL non-pecuniary damages were awarded for the man... As explained in paragraph (1) above, the defendant-plaintiff woman is seriously at fault in the events that led to the divorce. The woman's faulty behavior also constitutes an attack on the man's personal rights. In the concrete case, the conditions of Article 174/2 of the TMK were met for the benefit of the plaintiff-defendant man. In that case, while an appropriate amount of non-pecuniary compensation should be assessed in favor of the plaintiff-defendant man, taking into account the social and economic situations of the parties, the severity of the fault and the principle of fairness (TMK Art.